Gabriel Night's Polyamorous test.
I tried. I figured... Theoretically, I should score well on this... Um... no
To be honest, I couldn't even answer half the questions (No really, half) because the selections are either convoluted, vicious extremes in both directions, or layered with so many facts that there is no way to find an answer that even approximates your opinions.
The test (for those that dare) is located on OKCupid
As you take the test (again... if inclined) feel free to look at my commentary which has been sent to the author. In general... this one needs work.
I am a software engineer. I am also openly poly. I am writing you because I tried to take your polyamoury test and wanted to send you a list of what I consider to be bugs in your test. This means, questions that are unanswerable because they pigeonhole the reader. The test is an excellent start, but I feel it needs a bit of revision...
Are you capable of loving more than one person at a time.
All these questions assume the person has never practiced polyamoury. The closest someone can select is choice 2 or 3. 2 causes a problem if the test taker wasn't close to their family, 3 fails because it outright says, "Though not in a relationship". 1 and 4 say, "No, I'm not poly"
The problem with the choices in question 3 is that you give to many factors in each choice. IE.
What is your favourite toping for pizza:
1. Mushrooms and cheesewhiz
2. Pepperoni and marshmellows
3. Beef and pureed spam
4. I hate any toppings on my pizza.
Question 6 is my next bug:
You find out a workmate is polyamourous - your reaction is closest to:
1: Weird, 2: Wow, I'm curious, 3: Sex maniac, 4: Potential relationship
This is a problem because you've got a series of reactions as if off a number line but all reactions are in the extreme. They are all either "run away or charge to" If you are going to list anything that fits on the number line. You always have to include 0 which is base reaction of neither extreme. In my case, the reaction would be, "Oh.. So?" I can't say that the person announcing poly would necessarily put them on my radar (4), but I'm certain that Weird (1) is out. I know that I have no questions or need to discuss it with the partner (2). And to me "Sex maniac" (3) seems like an abreaction.
9. I am not sure what to say here, but it's really in need of being rewritten.
10. The photo psychologically forces an answer choice. Futher, the picture shows sexual behavior which is separate from poly-mono amorous mentality. (amour - to love) There are swingers who have group sex and do not form relationships, there are polyamourous who love many but do not have group sex.
11. Same problem as 3. Too many facts per choice.
12 and 13. Can't answer. Disagree with all 4 choices. This is the same as #6. All answers are in the extreme.
14 is simply confusing. Are we trying to define dating or polyamourous behavior?
15. Numberline. How about: If there's the potential we discussed it in advance. It's the normal process of the long term relatiosnhip.
18. If you're going to have an extreme anti-reaction... it needs to be consistant and applicable to each question. Throwing it in randomly only creates a sense of humouir that doesn't really guage anything. Anyone with this severe a reaction isn't going to make it this far into the test.
19... too many possible answers. This one requires the evil: OTHER
My answer: It affords better honesty to self in who and what I am
20... as 19. Mine: It tests the mettle of your honesy to others.
Again, the test feels as though it was written from a mono standpoint trying to guage "Curiosity in this new and different lifestyle." Rather than guaging if the person "thinks" in mono or poly.
This is just my two bits. Please feel free to write me back if you have any questions or wish to discuss. My contact info is available via livejournal. I am lordandrei there as well.
As I said, the test is a good start. But at this point, I have to wait for a revision before I'll be able to take it.